Skip to content

Search

Personal Menu

Added to Favorites

Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance System


To promote sustainable growth and medium- to long-term improvements to our corporate value, we position swift decision-making, the proper performance of duties, and strengthening our management oversight functions as core issues for the Company. To ensure appropriate responses to these issues, we are strengthening the Board of Directors’ oversight functions. To accelerate and optimize business execution based on appropriate supervision by the Board of Directors, with a resolution passed on June 27, 2019 at the General Meeting of Shareholders, we switched to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Board to a company with an Audit & Supervisory Committee structure. Currently, the Board of Directors has 10 members, with at least one-third of the seats reserved for outside directors to strengthen its oversight function.

Board of Directors


The Board of Directors is chaired by the chairman of the Board and consists of 10 members. To strengthen the management platform, we have adopted a system with two representative directors. In addition, to strengthen the corporate governance system, the 67th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of June 29, 2023, resolved to increase the number of outside directors by one. As a measure to strengthen the oversight function, at least one-third of the seats on the Board of Directors (four of the 10 seats) are reserved for outside directors.

  • Seven directors (excluding directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members (of whom, two are outside directors)
  • Three directors serving as Audit & Supervisory Committee members (of whom, two are outside directors)

The term for directors (excluding directors serving as Audit & Supervisory Committee members) shall be one year in order to clarify management responsibilities and enable them to respond to rapid changes in operating environments.
The Board of Directors is responsible for the function of decision-making and overseeing business execution by management. The Board discusses and makes decisions on important management matters specified in laws and regulations, the Articles of Incorporation, and the Rules on the Board of Directors. To increase efficiency and agility in the execution of business, the Board of Directors delegates executive authority to executive officers on matters that do not meet the standards set for referral to the Board of Directors in laws and regulations, the Articles of Incorporation, and the Rules on the Board of Directors.
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, the Board of Directors met a total of 15 times. The attendance of each director at the meetings of the Board of Directors during the period is as shown in the table "Composition of the Board of Directors." The subjects of its discussions and deliberations included reports on the state of business and the progress of business performance, as well as matters requiring regular resolution such as the approval of the financial accounts and the convocation of the General Meeting of Shareholders, and important matters relating to business management and management policy considered with reference to the results of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors. These included future business development in light of the international situation, strategic business investment, the building of an environment for the next generation, initiatives to realize sustainability, and internal control issues in the Group.

Audit & Supervisory Committee


The Audit & Supervisory Committee is comprised of three directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members. The chair of the Audit & Supervisory Committee is selected by the committee members from among those members who are outside directors. The current chair is ABE Hirotomo.
In order to ensure the soundness and transparency of business management, Audit & Supervisory Committee members attend Board of Directors’ meetings and other important meetings including committee meetings and the Management Meeting and voice their opinions, as necessary, to ensure appropriate decision-making.
Audit & Supervisory Committee members also exercise strict oversight by meeting regularly to communicate with the representative directors, soliciting information and reports from directors (excluding directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members) and others, and reading the documentation for resolutions on important matters.

Nomination and Compensation Committees


With the aim of strengthening the transparency, independence, objectivity, and accountability of the process for nominating directors and determining their remuneration, we have arbitrarily established the Nomination Committee and the Compensation Committee as advisory bodies under the Board of Directors to obtain appropriate involvement and advice from independent outside directors.
When requested by the Board of Directors, the Nomination Committee, after due deliberation, submits proposals to the General Meeting of Shareholders concerning the nomination and removal of directors and recommendations on selection standards (including a succession plan) for director candidates.
When requested by the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee deliberates on and submits proposals to the Board of Directors concerning the agenda for the General Meeting of Shareholders such as compensation for directors and recommendations on such matters as policies related to the director compensation system and its framework.

Executive Officer System and Executive Officers


Executive officers are delegated certain authority to execute business according to the policies established by and under the supervision of the Board of Directors. The management structure is based on business management according to a matrix whose two axes are business units and functions. We have introduced a structure of three chief officers—CEO, CHRO, and CFO—for management from the optimal Companywide perspective to strengthen governance functions.
Under this structure, a weekly Management Meeting is held to bring together the officers in charge of the various business units and functions to discuss important matters, share information, and expedite the execution of business. Executive officers are nominated based on competence and performance history and are selected by the Board of Directors from among elite human resources capable of contributing to the further growth of consolidated operations. The term of office is one year, the same as for directors (other than directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members).

Composition of the Board of Directors


We believe that it is necessary for the Board of Directors to be comprised of members with diverse perspectives, experience, and skills in order to ensure effective management and oversight functions. As such, in addition to inside directors who are familiar with the Company’s business, our Board of Directors is comprised of outside directors possessing broad knowledge and extensive
experience in corporate management, science, administration, finance and accounting, law, and other fields.
Outside directors bring in external perspectives and increase management transparency. The Company also appoints outside directors to further strengthen the oversight function regarding the execution of business. They are experts who can provide opinions and advice from a wide variety of perspectives, including that of stakeholders, and are invited to Board of Directors’ meetings and other meetings.
For the selection of director candidates, a skills matrix has been prepared presenting an overview of the knowledge, experience, abilities, and other attributes expected of directors (see table "Composition of the Board of Directors"). In addition to the expertise and experience indicated in the matrix, the selection of director candidates aims to achieve a balance in terms of diversity, affiliations (independence), years of service, and other attributes. With additional consideration given to changes in the business environment and other factors, the aim is to achieve a Board of Directors whose composition will promote the strengthening of corporate governance and corporate value increase.
The Company engages in ongoing review of the optimal composition of the Board of Directors.

Composition of the Board of Directors

 

Name

Gender

Nomination Committee

Compensation Committee

Expertise and experience (skills matrix)

Attendance at Board of Directors’ meetings in FYE 3/2023

Years of service as director/ Audit & Supervisory Committee member

Management and management strategy Management of key departments Finance and accounting Law/risk management Global business

Directors

KASHIO Kazuhiro     15/15(100%) 12
MASUDA Yuichi       -/- (-%) Appointed June 2023
TAKANO Shin       15/15 (100%) 8
KASHIO Tetsuo           15/15 (100%) 4
YAMAGISHI Toshiyuki       15/15 (100%) 10
OZAKI Motoki ☆       15/15 (100%) 4
SUHARA Eiichiro ☆       -/- (-%) Appointed June 2023

Audit & Supervisory Committee Members

ABE Hirotomo ☆       15/15 (100%) 4
CHIBA Michiko ☆       15/15 (100%) 5*1
YAMAGUCHI Akihiko           15/15 (100%) 2

☆:Outside Director ●:Chair 〇:Committee member
*1 Years of service as Audit & Supervisory Board member and director of the Company. Appointed as director in June 2019. 
*2 The above table is not an exhaustive listing of the directors’ expertise and experience.

Directors’ Training


Based on the belief that directors must continue to advance their skills and knowledge if they are to sufficiently fulfill their roles, we actively promote self-improvement by directors. The Company continuously offers the support, including the provision of information, opportunities, and cost reimbursements, necessary for self-improvement.
We continuously offer information to promote a better understanding of our business operations, particularly for outside directors. This includes planning and providing opportunities, both at the time of appointment and throughout the term of their appointment, to participate in important internal meetings, tour domestic and overseas plants and offices, and attend internal research seminars. Directors who are members of the Audit & Supervisory Committee are provided opportunities for skills improvement necessary for their roles and responsibilities through information provision by the Japan Audit & Supervisory Board Members Association and participation in seminars.

Outside Directors


Outside directors are appointed in order to enhance corporate transparency by incorporating external perspectives into management and further strengthening oversight of operations. The Company appoints experts who are able to provide opinions and advice from stakeholder and other diverse perspectives to the Board of Directors meetings and other meetings.
The three outside directors make suggestions as needed to ensure the validity and appropriateness of decision-making by the Board.

Reason for Appointment as an Outside Director

OZAKI
Motoki
Independent
Director
Mr. OZAKI possesses many years of management experience at Kao Corporation. Drawing on this experience, he has contributed greatly to invigorating the discussions of the Board of Directors and improving its effectiveness by making highly valuable and timely comments and proposals on the management of the Company in general from an objective and varied perspective based on his extensive experience and deep knowledge. He was appointed additionally for his contribution as the chair of the Nomination Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee to discussions on improving the transparency and effectiveness of the director appointment process and to discussions looking into the process for determining director compensation.
SUHARA
Eiichiro
Independent
Director
Mr. SUHARA was active for many years at Mitsubishi Pencil Co., Ltd., where he displayed outstanding skill in business management and played an important role in the company’s sustainable growth and corporate value increase. Taking an objective and varied perspective based on his extensive experience and deep knowledge, he has contributed to invigorating the discussions of the Board of Directors and improving its effectiveness. He was appointed additionally for his contribution as a member of the Nomination Committee and the Compensation Committee to discussions on improving the transparency and effectiveness of the director appointment process and to discussions looking into the process for determining director compensation.
ABE
Hirotomo
Independent
Director
Mr. ABE possesses extensive experience of working overseas for a general trading company and specialist knowledge based on his research and other activities as a graduate school student and professor in the fields of law and business management. He has contributed greatly to invigorating the discussions of the Board of Directors and improving its effectiveness by commenting actively on the management of the Company in general from these specialist perspectives. He was appointed additionally for his contribution as a member of the Nomination Committee and as the chair of the Compensation Committee to discussions on improving the transparency and effectiveness of the director appointment process and to discussions looking into the process for determining director compensation.
CHIBA
Michiko
Independent
Director
Ms. CHIBA possesses expertise in finance and accounting and extensive auditing experience as a certified public accountant. She has contributed greatly to invigorating the discussions of the Board of Directors and improving its effectiveness by commenting actively on the management of the Company in general from these specialist perspectives. She was appointed additionally for her contribution as a member of the Nomination Committee and the Compensation Committee to discussions on improving the transparency and effectiveness of the director appointment process and to discussions looking into the process for determining director compensation.

Diagram of corporate governance system

Internal Auditing


The Internal Audit Group, which consists of seven members (including one who is a member of the Audit & Supervisory Committee staff), formulates an annual audit plan (reviewed every six months) in light of the risk situation and, in accordance with the plan, audits the status of organizational management based on common Group standards. The Internal Audit Group then reports the results to directors as appropriate to maintain and strengthen the internal control and monitoring system. Meanwhile, the Internal Audit Group exchanges information and opinions with the Audit & Supervisory Committee on a regular basis and holds monthly meetings with it. When planning internal audits and after conducting them, the Internal Audit Group submits a report on the audit items to the Audit & Supervisory Committee, and the two work together in this way to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the audit function.

Analysis and Evaluation of Board of Directors’ Effectiveness


With an awareness of the changes in the roles expected of the Board of Directors, we evaluate the effectiveness of the Board of Directors and conduct reviews aimed at strengthening organizational and operational governance.
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, as in the previous fiscal year, we conducted a survey of the directors (including Audit & Supervisory Committee members) to identify potential improvements to the role, functions, operational management, and other aspects of the Board of Directors.
This resulted in the finding that the allocation of discussion time to key management issues had been found to promote constructive discussion. Elsewhere, opinions were expressed on ensuring diversity on the Board of Directors and on the proportion of outside directors. Additionally, the opinion was expressed that there was a need to strengthen the effectiveness of the business execution oversight function by conducting discussion from a strategic and medium- to long-term perspective and by monitoring the progress of the three-year medium-term management plan. Based on the results of this evaluation, we will work to further increase the effectiveness of the Board and make continuous improvements.

Director Compensation


The compensation of directors of the Company is as stipulated below.

Director Compensation Composition

Performance-Linked Compensation


Performance-linked compensation in the form of bonuses is decided based on an evaluation of the results of management efforts to strengthen initiatives aimed at improving corporate performance, increasing corporate value, and achieving sustainable growth for society. Specifically, the decision is made with reference to the degree of attainment of financial targets (based on the indicators of operating profit, net sales, and return on equity [ROE] as shown in the consolidated financial accounts) and non-financial targets (sustainability indicators), and after comparing each indicator with the previous fiscal year’s performance.

Breakdown of non-monetary Compensation


We have introduced a system of non-monetary compensation in the form of restricted stock compensation. The aim is not only to provide an incentive toward continuous increase in corporate value, but also to further reinforce the sense of value sharing with shareholders. The number of shares allocated to each individual is calculated by dividing a figure representing a fixed proportion of the individual’s total annual compensation by the stock price.* A restriction on stock transfer applies until the director’s retirement.

* Closing price on the day before the Board of Directors meeting at which allocation is approved.

Resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders on Director Compensation


A resolution was passed at the 63rd Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of June 27, 2019, setting the maximum combined annual compensation amount at a total of 400 million yen for the directors (excluding directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members but including a maximum annual amount of 30 million yen for the outside directors) and a total of 70 million yen for directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members. The above compensation does not include employee salaries paid to directors with concurrent employee duties. The number of directors as of the close of the above General Meeting of Shareholders (excluding directors who were Audit & Supervisory Committee members) was five (including one outside director), and the number of directors who were Audit & Supervisory Committee members was three. At the same meeting, the maximum combined annual amount of restricted stock compensation for the directors (excluding Audit & Supervisory Committee members and outside directors) was set, within the above limits on director compensation, at a total of 100 million yen (maximum 80,000 shares). As of the close of the above General Meeting of Shareholders, the number of applicable directors was four.

Agreed Policy on the Content of the Individual Directors’ Compensation


(1) Method of deciding agreed policy on the content of the individual directors’ compensation
To set the agreed policy on the content of the individual directors’ compensation, the Board of Directors advised the Compensation Committee on the formulation of draft proposals, and the Board of  Directors’ meeting held on March 25, 2021, adopted an agreed policy with acceptance of the content of the submitted proposals.

(2) Outline content of the agreed policy
The two points indicated below form the basic policy on the compensation of directors (excluding directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee members; the same applies below), which is designed to function as a healthy incentive toward sustainable growth.

  • Compensation is set at a competitive level with a view to attracting external human resources
  • Compensation is designed to serve as an incentive promoting a healthy entrepreneurial spirit

The level of compensation is set according to the role expected of the position, with market benchmarking for reference.
The compensation of directors other than outside directors is composed of a fixed component supplemented by a performance-linked component made up of bonuses and stock compensation. In view of their particular duties, the compensation of outside directors consists of fixed compensation only.
To give greater emphasis to performance-linked compensation, the relative weights of the compensation components are set at 60% for fixed compensation and 40% for performance-linked compensation (of the performance-linked compensation, 25%consists of bonuses and 15% of stock compensation). However, these proportions may be adjusted according to the individual role.
Regarding the timing of the payment of compensation, the period from July of each year until the following June is the period for which the annual compensation amount is paid, with the fixed compensation paid in monthly installments. Bonuses are paid in December and June, while stock compensation is provided in a single allocation in July.

Delegation of Responsibility for Decision on Individual Directors’ Compensation


To decide the individual directors’ compensation, the Compensation Committee, chaired by an outside director, discusses aspects of director compensation such as the compensation system and compensation level in response to a request from the Board of Directors and submits proposals to the Board of Directors, based on which the Board of Directors delegates to the chairman of the Board and the president and CEO the responsibility for deciding the individual compensation in accordance with the compensation limits adopted by the General Meeting of Shareholders and the agreed policy on compensation. The chairman of the Board and the president and CEO confer with the directors who are Compensation Committee members before deciding on individual compensation based on the proposals submitted by the committee and with reference to performance in terms of both oversight of business management and business execution. The reason for the delegation of the decision on individual compensation to the chairman of the Board and the president and CEO is that these officers are considered the most appropriate to evaluate the department which the director is in charge of based on an overview of the Company’s performance, etc.

Compensation for FYE 3/2023

Executive category Total compensation amount Total amount by compensation type Number of applicable executives
Directors
(Excluding Audit & Supervisory Committee members and outside directors)

196 million yen

Fixed compensation 117 million yen

5

Performance-linked compensation 78 million yen

Non-monetary compensation

included in the above figure

43 million yen
Audit & Supervisory Committee members
(Excluding outside directors)
15 million yen Fixed compensation 15 million yen 1
Outside directors 33 million yen Fixed compensation 33 million yen 3

Notes:
1. Amounts paid to directors do not include employee wages paid to directors with managerial duties.
2. The total amount of non-monetary compensation for directors (excluding Audit & Supervisory Committee members and outside directors) is made up of 37 million yen in performance-linked compensation.

Dialogues with Shareholders


We recognize that it is crucial to build a long-term, trust-based relationship with our shareholders and investors through proactive dialogue, so we have a dedicated executive officer responsible for IR activities under the direction of our president and CEO.
Our internal structure promotes a common awareness of the importance of dialogue with shareholders. We
collaborate on IR activities by gathering and accumulating necessary information from the networks linking relevant departments. Directors or executive officers directly engage in IR activities as necessary depending on theme and content. In addition to sharing opinions received through shareholder interactions with the Board of Directors, we also share information at the Management Meeting and on other occasions as necessary to reflect those opinions in measures aimed at improving corporate value.
To ensure the management of insider information during IR activities, we have outlined rules concerning the
handling of important undisclosed information and work to ensure strict implementation of those rules. Part of our response measures includes requiring that meetings are attended by multiple people.
In addition to communication through individual meetings, other measures for IR management include holding quarterly earnings briefings for institutional investors and securities analysts where the president and CEO or executive officer responsible for IR provides a summary of financial results and future outlook. To promote further understanding of our Company, we are enhancing external communications by listing various IR information on our website and have established a help desk for receiving inquiries from shareholders.

Basic Views on Internal Control System and Progress on System Development


The Casio Group has established the Charter of Creativity for Casio, Casio Common Commitment and Casio Business Conduct Guidelines based on the corporate creed of “Creativity and Contribution.” The following systems have been implemented to ensure proper business operation.

1. System to ensure that performance of duties by directors and employees of the Company and group companies comply with the Articles of Incorporation and relevant laws and regulations

a. Based on laws, the Articles of Incorporation, and rules for the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors decides important issues relating to legal requirements and management of the Company and group companies, and prevents violations of the law or the Articles of Incorporation by monitoring the performance of duties by the directors.
b. In order to comply with relevant laws and regulations regarding the performance of duties, specific documents such as policies and rules are prepared. Awareness of these is promoted throughout the Company and each Group Company after various committees, such as the Internal Control Committee, have examined and deliberated on them.
c. The Whistleblower Hotline has been established with internal and external channels and operates as the point of contact for inquiries and reporting on problems related to legal violations and other compliance matters. The Company ensures that whistleblowers are not penalized.
d. The Company and Group companies are not involved with antisocial forces, which pose a threat to social order and public safety, in any way, and the entire organization is resolute in refusing any improper demands.
e. The validity and operational adequacy of the above-mentioned rules are improved through internal audits and continual review, in order to prevent any misconduct.

2. System for retaining and managing information relating to performance of duties by directors and employees of the Company and group companies

Each department retains and manages information relating to the performance of duties by the directors and employees concerned, based on the Document Management Rules and other rules.

3. Risk management rules and other systems at the Company and the Group Companies

a. The Company and the Group Companies have a system to manage risks that can have a significant impact on management. The system is promoted in a unified way by the relevant departments and the Secretariat for the Internal Control Committee, based on the Risk Management Rules.
b. Fundamental Policies on Product Safety and an implementation system have been established with an understanding that maintaining customer confidence in product safety is an important management issue.

4. System to ensure the efficient performance of duties by directors and employees of the Company the Group Companies

a. Board of Directors meetings are held to discuss important management issues facing the Company and the Group Companies. Such meetings are held at least once a month, in principle, to enable decisions to be made swiftly and in a reasonable manner.
b. The Company’s executive officers and directors (including Audit & Supervisory Committee members) attend Management Meeting to discuss and decide on the execution of important business matters. They ensure group-wide coordination and smooth implementation of measures.
c. Detailed execution procedures are outlined in the Executive Decision Making Authority Rules and the Group Company Decision Making Authority Rules.
d. The Group Companies have created a system for performance of duties based on consolidated management plans, the Group Company Decision Making Authority Rules, and various basic group policies.

5. System to ensure proper operations at the Company and group companies

a. To ensure proper operations, the Company and the Group Companies have various rules based on the Charter of Creativity for Casio, Casio Common Commitment, and Casio Business Conduct Guidelines.
b. The Company assigns certain directors or executive officers based on a system under which directorsand officers are responsible for specific Group Companies. The relevant directors and executive officers perform the Group Company management through a system that requires reporting to and approval by the Company, in accordance with the Group Company Decision Making Authority Rules. They also perform monitoring as necessary.
c. The Company and the Group Companies have built a system to ensure the adequacy and reliability of financial reporting. After internal controls related to business flow and financial reporting are inspected, they are documented and evaluated, and revised to improve them.

6. System for employees that assist Audit & Supervisory Committee in the performance of their duties, and the independence of those employees from the directors (who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members)

a. Employees are appointed to assist Audit & Supervisory Committee in their duties.
b. Matters concerning the appointment, transfer, evaluation or discipline of employees who assist the Audit & Supervisory Committee require prior consent from the Audit & Supervisory Committee. 

7. System for the Company’s directors and employees and group companies’ directors, auditors, and employees to report to the Audit & Supervisory Committee; other systems for reporting to the Audit & Supervisory Committee; and systems to ensure that audits by the Audit & Supervisory Committee are performed effectively

a. Whenever something that is likely to cause significant damage to the Company or the Group Companies, facts pertaining violation of the law or the Articles of Incorporation, or facts pertaining to illegal conduct of business are discovered, the Company’s directors and employees must immediately report these to the Audit & Supervisory Committee.
b. Whenever something that likely to cause significant damage to the Company or the Group Companies, facts pertaining to a violation of the law or the Articles of Incorporation, or facts pertaining to illegal conduct of business are discovered, the directors, auditors and employees of a Group Company must immediately report it to the Company officer in charge of the Group Company, and that officer must immediately report it to the Audit & Supervisory Committee.
c. Whenever a Group Company’s directors, auditors and employees determine that a management action or guidance from the Company may violate the law, or may present a compliance issue, they must report it to the Audit & Supervisory Committee.
d. The Company’s directors and employees and the directors, auditors and employees of the Group Companies will submit reports and information in response to requests from the Audit & Supervisory Committee.
e. The Company’s Internal Audit Department periodically reports the results of audits of the Company and the Group Companies to the Audit & Supervisory Committee.
f. The Whistleblower Hotline Secretariat reports the status of whistleblower reports and measures taken to the Audit & Supervisory Committee.
g. The Company and the Group Companies ensure that people who have made a report to the Audit & Supervisory Committee are not penalized.
h. The Company promptly processes any requests it receives for the prepayment or reimbursement of expenses arising from the performance of duties by the Audit & Supervisory Committee.
i. Audit & Supervisory Committee Members may attend any important internal meeting of the Company.
j. Important ringi approval documents of the Company and the Group Companies are reported to the Audit & Supervisory Committee after approval.

Select a location